| 當前位置 ： 首頁 > 法務與風險 > 法務知識
|
| |
| 工程圖的知識產權歸屬 |
| |
| 發布時間： 2014-06-24 |
[特大 大 中 小] |
（一）工程設計圖、產品設計圖知識產權歸屬
Intelectual property onwership of engineering or product design planning
1、創作工程設計圖、產品設計圖的特點
Characteristics of the creation of engineering or product design planning.
（1）需要利用單位的資質證書；
Require to use the lisene of design institute;
（2）主要利用單位的物質技術條件創作；
Require to use the material and technical conditions of design institute;
（3）由單位承擔責任。
The design institute will take responsibility;
2、創作的工程設計圖、產品設計圖，著作權的歸屬
Intelectual property onwership of engineering or product design planning, or copyright
（1）員工創作工程設計圖、產品設計圖的著作權歸單位所有；
The copyrights of staff’s engineering or product design planning belong to unit.
（2）業主委托單位的，由業主和單位通過合同約定；
If the unit is commissioned by owner, the intelectual rights depends on the provision in the contract.
（3）合同未作明確約定或者沒有訂立合同的，著作權屬于受托人。
If no specific clauses about the copyright in contract, the copyrights belong to the consignee.
（二）案例分析
Case analysis
1、案例情況 Case Introduction
2010年4月，xx集團公司（簡稱公司）以方案競賽的方式邀請六家設計單位參加其新建集團總部辦公樓方案征集，前三名設計費分別為30萬、20萬、15萬，其余三家各10萬，設計周期2個月。邀請函中既未說明后續設計工作的承接，也未約定參賽方案知識產權的歸屬。
In April 2010, XX Corporation(breviated as company) invited six design institutes to participate in the program of its new Group headquarters office collection by the way of contest, and the top three design fee is respectively 300000Yuan, 200000Yuan, 150000Yuan, and the three is 100000Yuan each, in a design cycle of two months. In the invitation letter, the company neither explained how to undertake the follow-up design work, not to stipulated the attribution of intellectual property rights in the competition program.
同年6月，六家設計單位同時提交了設計方案，經專家組評審確定了競賽名次，并分別支付了設計費。同年8月，公司與方案競賽第二名的設計單位（簡稱乙設計單位）簽署了設計合同，但獲批方案與競賽第一名設計院（簡稱甲設計院）的方案大多數方面幾乎雷同。
In June, the six design institutes submit their programs on time. Design contest ranking was determined by the expert group review, and design institutes were paid design fees. In August of the same year, the company and the design institute ranking second in the program contest (referred to as B-design institute) signed a design contract, however, most of the approved program is almost identical with the program designed by institute ranking first.( breviated as A institute)
2010年10月，甲設計院向法院提起訴訟，要求公司及乙設計單位停止侵權，并賠償損失150萬元。
In October 2010, A design institute taked proceedings to the court to require the company and B institute to stop the infringement, and compensate for the loss of 150 million yuan.
2011年3月經法院調解，甲設計院同意將其設計方案的知識產權轉讓給公司，同時公司向其支付80萬元方案費。
In March, 2011, after court mediation, A design institute agreed to transfer the intellectual property rights of their design to the company, and company would pay a program fee of 800,000 Yuan.
2、分析 Case Analisys
甲設計院之所以能夠有效維護自身的合法權，原因如下：
A Design Institute could be able to safeguard their legitimate rights for the following reasons:
（1）xx集團公司未約定參賽方案知識產權歸屬，按照相關規定，其知識產權歸屬創作單位；
XX Corporation failed to sign an agreement on the ownership of intellectual property in competition program. In accordance with the relevant provisions, the intellectual property rights vested in the creation units;
（2）xx集團公司及乙設計單位擅自使用甲設計院的方案，構成侵權；
XX Corporation and B design institute unauthorized use program of A design institute, which constitutes infringement;
（3）方案已經獲批，停止使用，xx集團公司損失更大。
The program has been approved, if stop using, XX Corporation would suffer more loss.
|
|
|
| 瀏覽次數：162647 [打印][關閉]文章來源：證券法務部 |
 上一篇:有限責任公司股權的轉讓
下一篇:案例分析：新疆XXX公司與新疆XXX院
建設工程設計合同糾紛案 |
| |
|